(jo!) |
imported>MattisManzel mNo edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
<br><br> |
<br><br> |
||
yes, welcome Oleg :) [[User:Finn|Finn]] |
yes, welcome Oleg :) [[User:Finn|Finn]] |
||
| ⚫ | [[User:MattisManzel|MattisManzel]] 19:26, 7 May 2005 (CEST): Hi Oleg. I made a bit of a wiki-node on wiki4all, hope you like it. The categorization using page-names is not very flexible. I agree that there is no real fitting category for us yet. Geek-stuff somehow. Better is using the wiki-categories for categorization or even better let a real graph-structure grow like the wiki-node provides it and let relating wikis use a common node-wiki. I see wiki4all as a node-wiki, probably even an important one. What kind of wikis it is a node for will still come out, but it rather won't be for every type of wiki as others are knoding wikis as well. Hey thanks for this, you are an enthusiast. |
||
| ⚫ | [[User: |
||
Revision as of 17:26, 7 May 2005
Nice to have you here Oleg.
It seems hard for me to find a matching category for us in your catalogues..Hmm, thinnking about which fits best. Greets to Moscow. mutante 14:24, 7 May 2005 (CEST)
yes, welcome Oleg :) Finn
MattisManzel 19:26, 7 May 2005 (CEST): Hi Oleg. I made a bit of a wiki-node on wiki4all, hope you like it. The categorization using page-names is not very flexible. I agree that there is no real fitting category for us yet. Geek-stuff somehow. Better is using the wiki-categories for categorization or even better let a real graph-structure grow like the wiki-node provides it and let relating wikis use a common node-wiki. I see wiki4all as a node-wiki, probably even an important one. What kind of wikis it is a node for will still come out, but it rather won't be for every type of wiki as others are knoding wikis as well. Hey thanks for this, you are an enthusiast.