×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 3,189 articles on s23. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    s23
    3,189Articles

    OffTopic/SpamHereOnly: Difference between revisions

    Content added Content deleted
    imported>MattisManzel
    imported>MattisManzel
    Line 39: Line 39:
    [[User:MattisManzel|MattisManzel]] 19:47, 17 December 2005 (CET): A very interesting spam indeed. There is a special aesthetics about it that I don't really grok yet.
    [[User:MattisManzel|MattisManzel]] 19:47, 17 December 2005 (CET): A very interesting spam indeed. There is a special aesthetics about it that I don't really grok yet.


    Imagine wiki-farms just with that. We must use spam, spam used right is a super-sword. ;)
    Imagine wiki-farms just with that. We must use spam (I mean passively, by tolerating it in a clever way), spam used right is a super-sword. ;)


    Could I use this technique on ordinary text?
    Could I use this technique on ordinary text?

    Revision as of 19:05, 17 December 2005

    (Spam below the pic. Do not change the header please.)

    Spam is tolerated on this page

    and on its subpages (if you should feel like making such). If you spam on any other page of s23-wiki the pages you spamvertize will be listed in a shared antispam database with the consequence that you can't spam anymore anywhere at all on the antispam-organized wikis. Neither on this page here.

    Wouldn't that be a pitty?

    Thank you for reading and understanding this. Have a nice day.




    btw: If you don't want your stuff to be deleted here, don't delete the other's stuff.

    http://www.cert.dfn.de/infoserv/dib/c3_animation.gif


    your spam goes here

    spam, endless boring urls, more spam ...

    www.microsoft.com/404



    But i dont like hidden spam that uses style=overflow =

    
    	
    
    spam canceled, the spamfilter blocked saving this page. :) Can we turn it off for this page?

    MattisManzel 19:47, 17 December 2005 (CET): A very interesting spam indeed. There is a special aesthetics about it that I don't really grok yet.

    Imagine wiki-farms just with that. We must use spam (I mean passively, by tolerating it in a clever way), spam used right is a super-sword. ;)

    Could I use this technique on ordinary text?

    Would be good for trolling. ;)

    Works, I love it.

    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.