×
Create a new article
Write your page title here:
We currently have 3,189 articles on s23. Type your article name above or create one of the articles listed here!



    s23
    3,189Articles

    Great Britain has had the "National Health Service" for over 50 years. When it was introduced in 1948, it's main goal was to give every person the same access to medical treatment, no matter what their social status, or income is. There are no fees when going to the physician like it is the case in germany for example. Normally patients have to partially pay for their pharmaceuticals, dental treatments and glasses, but it is relatively easy to be freed from this contribution (children, senior citizens). These circumstances lead to a situation in which not even half the people have to pay anything for their medical care.


    The health system is devided into different levels. Primary care, secondary care and sometimes tertiary care. Primary care describes the medical care in immediate vicinity (unmittelbarer nähe). When talking "about secondary care" one is talking about health care performed by specialists such as dentists, cardiologists or psychologists. Sometimes a third level - being tertiary care - is named. Highly professionalized doctors such as plastic surgeons are sometimes categorized in this way.

    Normally, a patient first has to consult his General Practitioner (GP). The postal code in which the patient lives determines which GP he has to consult. Large cities usually have several GPs per disctrict, but there are still not a lot of choices one can make when it comes to picking a GP. The General Practitioner is also - other than in Germany - responsible for medical examinations such as windpocks or preventive cancer inspections. If necessary, the GP transfers the patient to a specialist or a hospital. Often more than one GP work in one practice or medical center in which most of the time multiple services, such as physiotherapy or dental care are also offered. The GPs are payed by the ammount of people they care for which is calculated through lists. They can also perform services which are not regularely included in "primary health care" and thereby make it a free of charge service to the patient.

    More than 70% of NHP's financing is funded by taxes. About 20% come from social insurance contribution and another 5% come from various fees. All in all, Great Britain's health system is a tax funded, public service. Sadly it is becomeing more and more clear that this funding system is not working perfectly. In the fiscal year (finanzjahr) 2005/2006 there was a deficit of about 750 million euro. Reforms, cut backs and inclusion of private companies into the system is what is being tried in order to get the finances back on track again.

    Most of Great Britains citizens are satisfied with National Health Service, even though there are a couple of downsides, such as the long time patiens often have to wait for surgery or appointements with GPs. All in all it is one of the world's best health system though according to the World Health Organistion, as a recentstudy showed.

    It was done on behalf of "the comonwealth fund" and carried out in Australia, Canada, Germany, the United Kingdom, New Zealand and the United states. In each country a representative ammount of people were asked, who each suffered from a serious health problem within the past 2 years, were hospitalized or had a chronic issue.

    <<have to insert a chart here>>


    As the numbers show, the united kingdom compared to the other countries participating in the survey had the least ammount of people who skipped on prescribed drugs, did not visit a doctor even though they had a medical problem. This probably indicates, that citizens of the other countries often did this in order to prevent costs that might have resulted herefrom.

    <<and here>>

    when these patients were asked if they had to pay for costs resulting in their treatment, 65% of the british participants answered they had no costs whatsoever. This is a very high rate when compared to Canada who is second with only 22%.

    The graph on the right shows a comparison of the ammount of patients taking part in the study, who had to pay more than 1000 US dollars within the past 12 months. Here again the NHS is organized in a way, that makes sure that the health system is accessable to any citizen. Only 4% of Great Britain's participants in the survey had to pay such high sums. While in other countries double the people had to do so, and even more than a third did in the United States.

    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.
    Cookies help us deliver our services. By using our services, you agree to our use of cookies.